MannyHead3_r1_c1.gif
Ask Dr. Manny

Can genetics counseling really offer answers?

by Tracy Montgomery
Posted on Jul 30, 2006

The phone rang around seven o’clock on a Friday night; I thought it was one of our friends calling. The caller ID box said, “CARSON, MILINDA MD” and I knew something was wrong. Your obstetrician never calls on a Friday night with good news.

The tone in her voice confirmed what I suspected. I listened to her talk about test results and an abnormality. Then she said it – cystic fibrosis. Now I remembered. As I was walking out the door of her office several months before, she had called after me and asked if I wanted the test for cystic fibrosis added to the list of blood tests she was ordering. I said, “Sure, why not?” I had forgotten about it until that moment.

For some reason, the staff at the clinical lab had taken two months instead of two weeks to get the results. So here I was on a Friday night listening to my doctor while she told me I was a carrier for cystic fibrosis.

The thought that I could have passed along a terrible disease to my unborn child was devastating. I couldn’t imagine how we could care for a child with a chronic, life-long ailment that would likely kill him before he reached his twenties. My husband Matt was trying to get me to explain to him what the doctor had said but I was crying too hard for him to understand.

He paged Dr. Carson and asked her detailed questions about what the results meant and what our next step would be. My husband arranged to pick up the prescription for his cystic fibrosis test the coming Monday. The next day I was traveling to Albany for a business trip. The last thing I needed to do was drive three hours north and spend several days away from my daughter and husband. I returned home late Tuesday evening. My husband and I arrived at the genetic counselor’s office first thing Wednesday morning. We waited in an area filled with parents who were bringing their children for visits with their doctors. Most of the kids had genetically related developmental or physical problems.

I only had to look at my husband’s face to know what he was thinking. Would we be these parents? Would we be bringing our child for visits with endless specialists?

Our genetic counselor repeatedly told us the statistical odds were in our favor even if my husband was a carrier. Only twenty-five percent of babies born to parents who are both carriers actually have cystic fibrosis. None of that seemed to matter because the bottom line was that until my husband’s test results came back, we would be in an emotional limbo.

There are more than 1,000 variations of the defective CF gene and 30,000 Americans currently live with some form of the disease. According to the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, the “defective gene causes the body to produce a faulty protein that leads to abnormally thick, sticky mucus that clogs the lungs and can result in fatal lung infections.” The abnormal mucus can also affect the pancreas and bile duct, leading to permanent damage in some cases. The median age of survival, according to the foundation, is late 30s. 

They took Matt’s blood at the genetics office and assured us that this time it would take only two weeks, not months, to have the test results. I was already 16 weeks pregnant. Time was crucial. The counselor said we could legally terminate the pregnancy up to the twenty-fourth week, not after. Terminate the baby? What kind of hell were we living in?

The days after my husband’s test were the slowest of my life. The phone rang before nine o’clock on Friday morning. Instinctively, I knew it was the results without looking at the caller ID box.

“He is not a carrier,” the genetics counselor said. “I mean, we have ruled it out on all of the genes we have the ability to test, and he looks clear.”

I cried like a baby with relief.

I am still a carrier and could already have passed the carrier gene to my 6-year-old daughter, 3-year-old son and 1-year-old baby girl. They will have to be tested as adults for the gene to see if they, like me and 10 million other Americans, carry the defective version. If they are carriers, my children will have to ask their partners to test for the gene to see if they want to gamble on having a child with cystic fibrosis.

The test for cystic fibrosis only became available in October of 2001. I was blissfully unaware of my carrier status throughout my first pregnancy. The amount of stress this test placed on my family and me was unbearable. In the end, I wondered, what was the point of it? If my husband had been a carrier, I would have had an amniocentesis to test the baby and see if he had inherited the gene and the disease. What would we have done then—terminated a baby that we had carried and loved for five or six months because he wasn’t going to be perfect? Would we have been able to handle the demands of raising a chronically ill child? I’ll never know. We were blessed with a healthy baby boy who we named David.

I always respected families, who under the incredible strain of caring for a sick child, managed to provide some kind of normalcy for the rest of their children and family. That respect quadrupled over those three weeks while we waited for answers.

Genetics, and the science surrounding it, are truly amazing. But I wonder, if we are racing too fast to implement all of the new things we are learning without thinking of the consequences. There is no cure for cystic fibrosis. By taking genetic screening tests, you are not getting a jump-start on treating the disease. You are preparing yourself for what lies ahead. Is that better than waiting to see what happens once your child is born? Can genetics counseling really offer answers?



Comments

I greatly enjoyed reading Tracy Montgomery’s article about cystic fibrosis screeening.  It really confirmed what I have been seeing in my office almost every week:  scared pregnant couples who had been given very little information about the “routine” screening done as part of the prenatal panel.  When universal cystic fibrosis screening was conceived, it was thought that patients would be counseled about the test before giving informed consent.  Genetic counselors enthusiastically embraced the idea, thinking that patients would be offered counseling prior to testing.  Sadly, most patients are tested and are barely informed or not informed at all that a genetic test is being done.  Much like Tracy, most patients are completely surprised to find that they are carriers, but about one in 25 persons are carriers.  If an obstetrician sees 25 or 30 patients in a day, then at least one of them will be a carrier.  Informed consent is the key to accurate and useful testing.  Knowing all of the information prior to testing can help patients feel more comfortable about the choice and about either accepting or refusing testing.  Many patients are not aware that they can decline testing and are not informed that all newborns are screened for cystic fibrosis (and many other genetic diseases) at birth. 

Genetic counseling after the fact is never as good as counseling before testing because it is difficult to hear information and make good decisions when one is frightened and upset.  People often feel forced into decisons that perhaps they would have made differently if they had only had adequate time to think about all the ramifications.

As a genetic counselor for almost 20 years, one of the most difficult counseling situations is coming in after testing has already been done and abnormal results have been given by someone else.  Couples often can’t hear information completely or are confused about what has been done, about the accuracy of the testing and the type of results that are possible.  No matter how good the genetic couselor is, he or she cannot erase the news that has already been given and often cannot ease the fear and pain of the patient.

Every laboratory offers a fairly detailed brochure about cystic fibrosis screening.  If obstetricians would give one of these brochures to the patient at her very first prenatal visit, that would at least be a step in the right direction.  If obstetricians and other physicians are going to offer genetic testing, then they owe it to their patients to provide adequate counseling before the blood is drawn - even a 5 or 10 minute conversation stressing that genetic testing is optional would be better than asking the patient if she would like a test added as she is walking out the door.

Donna Fleming Wallerstein, M.S.
Certified Genetic Counselor

Posted by dwallerstein  on  08/28  at  02:54 PM

Page 1 of 1 pages

Post a Comment

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smileys

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:




Recent Articles